Feedstocks Push Resin Prices
Despite lackluster domestic demand, relentless increases in feedstock costs are forcing suppliers to push for higher resin prices.
Despite lackluster domestic demand, relentless increases in feedstock costs are forcing suppliers to push for higher resin prices. PVC demand is slack enough to put hikes in doubt.
PE PRICES UP
Polyethylene prices rose 3¢/lb in April, half of the 6¢ increase announced in December. The second half was expected to take effect in May, and a new 5¢ hike was announced for June 1. The London Metal Exchange (LME) North American futures contract for June in blown film butene LLDPE was 68.5¢/lb, up 0.9¢ from May.
Contributing factors: Mike Burns, global business director for PE at resin purchasing consultant Resin Technology, Inc. (RTI) in Fort Worth, Texas, expected PE suppliers to get their 3¢ hike in May. Domestic demand was down 3% to 6% in the first quarter vs. a year ago, and little improvement was expected in the second quarter. But resin operating rates reportedly are still running near 90%, thanks to export demand. “PE exports are still above average, yet lower than the very high levels of last year,” said Burns.
In addition, March’s ethylene monomer contract price had moved up from 58.5¢ to 61.5¢/lb, and spot ethylene prices also rose a few cents in April. Upwards movement seemed likely to continue, driven by low ethylene supplies. At press time, monomer contract negotiations for April/May involved possible increases from 3¢ to over 6¢/lb.
PP PRICES RISING
Polypropylene prices moved up 3¢ to 4¢/lb in April in a partial implementation of an announced 5¢ hike. An additional 5¢/lb increase for May 1 was revised upward by some suppliers to 7¢. Meanwhile, LME’s June North American short-term futures contract for g-p injection-grade homopolymer sold for 73.94¢, up more than 5¢ from May.
Contributing factors: Rising costs of feedstocks and energy to produce PP are cited by suppliers as justifying higher resin prices. Propylene monomer rose 5.5¢/lb in March and April, reaching a new record of 65¢/lb. Negotiations for May contract prices signaled increases of at least 4¢. Tight monomer supplies are not expected to ease soon. Scott Newell, RTI’s director of client services for PP says June could see another resin price hike.
Domestic PP demand was down 6.5% through April vs. last year. Exports dropped 20%, as U.S. resin prices are now too high. Suppliers have cut back North American PP capacity, and LyondellBasell just announced plans to halt PP production at the Equistar plant in Morris, Ill., by the end of the year. Suppliers’ resin inventories are pretty well balanced vs. demand. Says RTI’s Newell, “They are only making as much as they can sell. This gives them the leverage to pass through price increases as feedstock costs rise.”
PET COSTS MORE
PET prices moved up 5¢/lb as suppliers implemented their April increase. The move was driven by higher feedstock costs. In April, paraxylene went up 4¢/lb and ethylene glycol rose 2¢/lb. Together they translate into at least 2¢ to 3¢ higher cost/lb of PET. Although suppliers project increases in domestic demand of 5% to 6% this year—significantly less than the double-digit growth of recent years—first-quarter demand was flat. Some improvement is expected by mid-year, peak season for PET.
PVC HIKE IN DOUBT
PVC prices eventually settled up 2¢ in March and April, an increase deferred from Feb. 1. In May, PVC producers all announced a 4¢/lb hike for June 1. These increases are based solely on feedstock costs. Demand is still so weak that processors say any increase will have to be delayed. A bump upward in May was attributed to prebuying.
PS UP 4¢ TO 6¢
Ineos announced a hike of 4¢/lb for crystal PS and 6¢ for HIPS as of June 1. It was supported by Total and Americas Styrenics, the joint venture between Dow and Chevron Phillips, which went live May 1. The hikes are based on soaring benzene costs. Contract benzene hit $3.87/gal in May, up 12¢ from April. Butadiene rubber, which makes up 8-10% of HIPS, is short and on allocation, adding more cost pressure. Meanwhile demand picked up slightly, though not to normal spring levels.
Market Prices Effective Mid-May A | |||
RESIN GRADEb | ¢/LB | ¢/CU INc | |
ABS | |||
MED IMPACT | 90 - 110 | 3.4 - 4.2 | |
HI IMPACT | 95 - 131 | 3.6 - 5.0 | |
X-HI IMPACT | 105 - 145 | 4.0 - 5.5 | |
HI HEAT | 90 - 125 | 3.4 - 4.7 | |
PIPE | 89 - 100 | 3.7 - 3.8 | |
SHEET | 94 - 110 | 3.5 - 4.2 | |
TRANSPARENT | 129 - 200 | 5.6 - 8.8 | |
FITTINGS | 89 - 110 | 3.5 - 4.3 | |
PLATING | 160 | 6.0 | |
FLAME RET | 124 - 140 | 4.6 - 5.9 | |
STRUCT FM | 87 - 97 | 3.2 - 4.3 | |
10% GLASS | 129 - 140 | 4.8 - 5.6 | |
30% GLASS | 124 - 136 | 4.6 - 6.3 | |
ABS/PC ALLOY | 149 - 180 | 5.5 - 6.8 | |
ABS/PVC ALLOY | 134 - 139 | 5.0 - 5.2 | |
ABS/NYLON ALLOY | 194 - 350 | 9.0 - 16 | |
ACETAL | |||
HOMOPOL | 151 - 172 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
20% GLASS | 171 - 235 | 8.7 - 11.9 | |
COPOLYMER | 144 - 160 | 7.3 - 8.1 | |
25% GLASS | 171 - 245 | 8.7 - 12.4 | |
ACRYLIC | |||
G-P | 117 | 5.0 | |
IMPACT | 192 | 8.2 | |
ACRYLONITRILE COPOL | |||
EXTRUSION | 101 - 116 | 4.0 - 4.6 | |
INJECTION | 120 - 135 | 4.8 - 5.4 | |
ALKYD | 65 - 74 | 4.9 - 5.5 | |
CELLULOSICS | |||
ACETATE | 187 | 8.6 | |
CAB | 189 | 8.2 | |
CAP | 189 | 8.2 | |
DAP (G-P) | 251 - 497 | 16.7 - 34.7 | |
EPOXY | |||
G-P RESIN | 116 - 126 | NAd | |
COMPOUNDS | |||
C/B/Te | 123 - 166 | 9.4 - 12.9 | |
R/C/Df | 208 - 271 | 15.3 - 20.1 | |
SEMICONDUCTOR | |||
NOVOLAC | 193 - 228 | 13.1 - 15.9 | |
ANHYDRIDE | 188 - 268 | 13.9 - 19.2 | |
EVA | |||
INJECTION | 69 - 71 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
FILM EXTRU | 67 - 69 | 2.3 | |
EVOH | 330 | 15 | |
FLUORO-POLYMER | |||
CTFE | 5000 - 6000 | 385 - 462 | |
ECTFE | 1200 - 1680 | 90.7 - 120 | |
ETFE | 1205 - 1730 | 80.7 - 115.8 | |
FEP | 971 - 1470 | 74.8 - 113.2 | |
PFA | 1550 - 2520 | 120 - 195 | |
PTFE | 500 - 950 | 33.5 - 63.6 | |
PVDF | 693 - 1050 | 44.4 - 67.2 | |
IONOMER | |||
PACKAGING | 127 - 166 | 4.3 - 6.0 | |
INDUSTRIAL | 150 - 244 | 5.0 - 8.3 | |
LIQUID-CRYSTAL POLYMERS | |||
INJECTION MIN FILLED | 690 - 1035 | 44.2 - 72.1 | |
GLASS FILLED | 695 - 895 | 40 - 52 | |
CARBON FILLED | 1700 - 2000 | 83.2 - 138.6 | |
UNFILLED | 1000 - 1200 | 58 - 70 | |
EXTRUSION UNFILLED | 1200 - 2200 | 60.5 - 110.9 | |
MELAMINE COMPOUND | 90 - 94 | 5.5 - 5.6 | |
MELAMINE/PHENOLIC COMPOUND | 75 - 83 | 4.5 - 5.0 | |
NYLON | |||
TYPE 6 | 139 - 159 | 5.7 - 6.5 | |
MIN FILLED | 131 - 144 | 5.4 - 5.9 | |
30% GLASS | 148 - 173 | 6.0 - 7.0 | |
TYPE 66 | 153 - 168 | 6.3 - 6.9 | |
MIN FILLED | 151 - 159 | 6.2 - 6.5 | |
30% GLASS | 142 - 192 | 5.8 - 7.9 | |
TYPE 69 | 250 - 276 | 9.7 - 10.7 | |
TYPE 6/10 | 286 - 313 | 12.4 - 13.6 | |
TYPE 612 | 400 | 15.3 | |
30% GLASS | 309 - 311 | 14.7 | |
40% GLASS | 309 | 14.7 | |
TYPE 46 | 295 | 12.6 | |
TYPE 11 | 329 - 341 | 13.6 - 14.1 | |
30% GLASS | 331 - 350 | 15.0 - 15.8 | |
40% GLASS | 347 - 360 | 17.7 - 18.5 | |
TYPE 12 | 318 - 341 | 12.1 - 13.0 | |
30% GLASS | 327 - 350 | 14.7 - 15.8 | |
50% GLASS | 299 - 340 | 15.6 - 17.8 | |
TRANSPARENT AMORPHOUS | 247 - 360 | 10.3 - 15.0 | |
PHENOLIC MOLD COMP | 75 | 3.8 | |
REINFORCED GRADES | 105 - 268 | 6.1 - 16 | |
POLYAMIDE-IMIDEg | |||
UNFILLED | 2750 | 148.5 | |
30% GLASS | 2500 | 135 | |
30% CARBON FIB. | 3500 | 185 | |
POLYARYLATE | 200 - 280 | 8.8 - 12.3 | |
POLYARYL SULFONE | 440 | 21.8 | |
POLYBUTYLENE | |||
G-P | 94 - 96 | 3.1 | |
FILM | 88 - 91 | 2.9 | |
PIPE | |||
COLD WATER | 116 - 120 | 3.9 - 4.0 | |
HOT WATER | 162 - 166 | 5.5 - 5.6 | |
POLYCARBONATE | |||
INJECTION | 171 - 182 | 7.4 - 7.9 | |
20% GLASS | 177 - 190 | 7.6 - 8.2 | |
30% GLASS | 178 - 217 | 7.6 - 9.3 | |
EXTRUSION | 145 - 180 | 6.3 - 7.8 | |
BLOW MOLD | 150 - 185 | 7.0 - 7.5 | |
STRUCT FOAM | 149 - 181 | 6.4 - 7.8 | |
20% GLASS | 235 - 255 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
FR | 166 - 197 | 7.1 - 8.5 | |
CD | 135 - 195 | 5.8 - 8.4 | |
POLYESTER (TP) PBT TYPE | |||
UNFILLED | 145 - 150 | 6.8 - 7.3 | |
HI-IMP | 165 - 175 | 7.8 - 8.3 | |
30% GLASS, FR | 195 - 215 | 9.2 - 10.1 | |
STRUCT FOAM | 159 - 165 | NAd | |
PET | |||
BOTTLE (RAILCAR) | 80 - 82 | 4.0 - 4.1 | |
MOD PET | |||
30% GLASS | 132 - 143 | 7.4 | |
55% GLASS | 148 - 155 | 9.8 | |
30% GLASS FLAME RET | 147 - 157 | 9.2 | |
PETG COPOL | 114 - 124 | 5.2 - 5.6 | |
POLYESTER THERMOSET | |||
G-P ORTHO | 147 - 157 | NAd | |
ISOPHTHALIC | 175 - 190 | NAd | |
BIS-A | 210 - 230 | NAd | |
PEEK | 4400 | 231 | |
30% GLASS | 3300 | 173 | |
POLYETHERIMIDE | 641 - 646 | 29.3 - 29.5 | |
30% GLASS | 526 - 531 | 24.0 - 24.2 | |
POLYETHERKETONE (PEK) | 2950 | 130.1 | |
30% GLASS | 2600 | 153 | |
POLYETHERSULFONE | 350 - 400 | 17.2 - 19.7 | |
30% GLASS | 425 - 525 | 21 - 25.9 | |
POLYETHYLENE (RAILCAR) LDPE | |||
G-P MOLDING & EXTRU | 78 - 81 | 2.6 - 2.7 | |
INJECTION | 80 - 85 | 2.6 - 2.7 | |
LID RESIN | 82 - 84 | 2.7 | |
LINER | 77 - 79 | 2.6 | |
CLARITY | 76 - 78 | 2.5 - 2.6 | |
EXTRU COATG | 81 - 83 | 2.7 | |
BLOW MOLD | 83 - 84 | 2.7 | |
LLDPE, BUTENE BASED | |||
G-P MOLDING | 75 - 77 | 2.5 - 2.6 | |
LME 30-DAYj | 80 - 82 | 2.6 - 2.7 | |
FILM | 68.5 | 2.3 | |
ROTOMOLD | 77 - 79 | 2.6 | |
LLDPE, HAO-BASED | |||
G-P MOLDING | 78 - 80 | 2.6 | |
LID RESIN | 88 - 90 | 2.8 | |
LINER FILM | 81 - 83 | 2.7 | |
HDPE | |||
G-P INJ MOLD | 75 - 77 | 2.5 - 2.6 | |
FILM | 84 - 86 | 2.7 | |
BLOW MOLD | 85 - 88 | 2.7 | |
HMW-HDPE | |||
BLOW MOLDING | 82 - 84 | 2.6 - 2.7 | |
FILM | 83 - 86 | 2.7 | |
PIPE | 90 - 93 | 2.9 - 3.0 | |
UHMW-PE | 1.00 - 1.25 | 3.6 - 3.7 | |
PPE/PPO BASED RESIN | |||
INJECTION | 180 | 6.8 | |
20% GLASSh | 283 | 12.3 | |
30% GLASSh | 291 | 13.3 | |
EXTRUSIONh | 242 | 9.2 | |
STRUCT FM | 231 | NAd | |
PPS | |||
40% GLASS | 450 - 520 | 27.0 - 31.2 | |
55% GLASS/MINERAL | 345 - 420 | 22.7 - 27.7 | |
65% GLASS/MINERAL | 270 - 315 | 18.9 - 22.1 | |
POLYPROPYLENE (RAILCAR) | |||
G-P HOMOPOL INJECTION | 82 - 84 | 2.6 - 2.7 | |
LME 30-DAYj | 73.9 | 2.4 | |
EXTRUSION FIBER | 80 - 82 | 2.6 | |
PROFILES | 85 - 87 | 2.7 | |
RANDOM COPOL | |||
BLOW MOLDING | 86 - 88 | 2.7 | |
FILM | 86 - 88 | 2.7 | |
INJECTION | 85 - 87 | 2.7 | |
IMPACT COPOL | |||
MED IMP | 96 - 98 | 3.0 - 3.1 | |
HI IMP | 98 - 100 | 3.1 | |
POLYSTYRENE (RAILCAR) | |||
G-P CRYSTAL | 91 - 97 | 3.4 - 3.6 | |
HI HEAT | 94 - 100 | 3.7 - 3.6 | |
HIPS | 92 - 97 | 3.4 - 3.6 | |
SUPER HI IMP | 101 - 106 | 3.8 - 4.0 | |
FR | 107 - 113 | 4.0 - 4.2 | |
STRUCT FM (FR) | 105 - 108 | NA | |
EPS | |||
UNMODIFIED | 85 - 88 | NAd | |
MODIFIED | 86 - 90 | NAd | |
POLYSULFONE | 650 - 750 | 29 - 33 | |
10% GLASS 430 20.6 | 799 - 875 | 36 - 39 | |
30% GLASS 372 20.01 | 699 - 775 | 31 - 35 | |
POLYURETHANE (TP) | |||
ESTER TYPE | 185 - 255 | 8 - 11 | |
ETHER TYPE | 245 - 295 | 10.6 - 13 | |
PU ISOCYANATES | |||
POLYMERIC MDI | 125 - 145 | NAd | |
80/20 TDI | 135 - 145 | NAd | |
PVC RESIN (RAILCAR) | |||
G-P HOMOPOL | 57 - 59 | NAd | |
PIPE | 56 | NAd | |
FILM | 62 - 64 | NAd | |
COPOLYMER FLOORING | 69 - 74 | NAd | |
DISPERSION HOMOPOLY | 81 - 87 | NAd | |
COPOLYMER | 86 - 90 | NAd | |
CPVC PIPE COMPOUND | 119 | NAd | |
PVDC | |||
EXTRUDABLE | 162 | NAd | |
SILICONES | |||
MOLD. COMP. | 581 - 640 | 38.1 - 39.3 | |
SPECIALTY GR. | 891 - 3148 | NAd | |
SILICONE/EPOXY | 339 - 343 | 22.5 - 22.8 | |
STYRENEACRYLIC | 108 - 112 | 3.7 - 4.0 | |
SAN (G-P) | 80 - 88 | 3.0 - 3.3 | |
STYRENE MALEIC ANHYDRIDE | |||
G-P | 110 - 115 | 4.2 - 4.3 | |
HI IMP | 130 - 140 | 4.2 - 4.5 | |
FR | 175 - 183 | 6.7 - 7.0 | |
TP ELASTOMERS | |||
OLEFINIC | 70 - 76 | 2.4 | |
POLYAMIDE | 300 - 350 | 10.9 - 12.7 | |
POLYESTER | 200 - 310 | 8.8 - 13.6 | |
STYRENIC | 82 - 237 | 2.9 - 8.3 | |
UREA MOLDING COMPOUND | |||
BLACK & BROWN | |||
WHITE & IVORY | |||
VINYL ESTER | |||
COR RES | 223 - 240 | NAd | |
HEAT & COR RES | 248 - 253 | NAd | |
KEY: Colored areas indicate pricing activity. An arrow () indicates direction of price change. aTruckload, unless otherwise specified. bUnfilled, natural color, unless otherwise specified. cBased on typical or average density. dNot applicable. eNovolac and anhydride grades for coils, bushings, transformers.fNovolac and anhydride grades for resisitors, capacitors, diodes. gIn quantities of 20,000 lb. h19,800-lb load. jLME 30-day futures contract for lots of 54,564 lb.. |
Related Content
Fundamentals of Polyethylene – Part 6: PE Performance
Don’t assume you know everything there is to know about PE because it’s been around so long. Here is yet another example of how the performance of PE is influenced by molecular weight and density.
Read MoreThe Fundamentals of Polyethylene – Part 2: Density and Molecular Weight
PE properties can be adjusted either by changing the molecular weight or by altering the density. While this increases the possible combinations of properties, it also requires that the specification for the material be precise.
Read MoreImproving Twin-Screw Compounding of Reinforced Polyolefins
Compounders face a number of processing challenges when incorporating a high loading of low-bulk-density mineral filler into polyolefins. Here are some possible solutions.
Read MoreThe Fundamentals of Polyethylene – Part 1: The Basics
You would think we’d know all there is to know about a material that was commercialized 80 years ago. Not so for polyethylene. Let’s start by brushing up on the basics.
Read MoreRead Next
Beyond Prototypes: 8 Ways the Plastics Industry Is Using 3D Printing
Plastics processors are finding applications for 3D printing around the plant and across the supply chain. Here are 8 examples to look for at NPE2024.
Read MoreFor PLASTICS' CEO Seaholm, NPE to Shine Light on Sustainability Successes
With advocacy, communication and sustainability as three main pillars, Seaholm leads a trade association to NPE that ‘is more active today than we have ever been.’
Read MoreSee Recyclers Close the Loop on Trade Show Production Scrap at NPE2024
A collaboration between show organizer PLASTICS, recycler CPR and size reduction experts WEIMA and Conair recovered and recycled all production scrap at NPE2024.
Read More