FEA Software Predicts Material Response to Repeated Snap Fits
Improved finite-element modeling accounts for viscoelastic response to multiple stress-strain cycles.
Designing parts with snap fits present a particular challenge because of the repeated cyclic loading and unloading. During such cycles, the viscoelastic nature of thermoplastic materials determines how the bouncing back to “normal” occurs—and how it varies with time over multiple stress-strain cycles.
That’s part of the challenge that faced Novo Nordisk of Copenhagen, Denmark, a world leader in insulin self-injection pens. These pens are small, but they are precision instruments with a number of complex parts that must work in perfect coordination. Some pens are durable, containing a replaceable drug cartridge, while disposable ones come pre-filled with a drug. Injection typically involves twisting a short needle onto the pen, turning a dial to the required dose, and pushing a button to deliver the medication under the skin. After a given number of doses is injected, either the cartridge is replaced (for a durable device) or the pen is discarded (if a disposable version). In either case, audible clicks occur at key stages of the procedure, reassuring patients that they are engaging the device correctly at each step. But every one of those reassuring clicks represents a challenge to the design engineers. So do the clicks the patient never hears—those that occur during assembly of the pens in production.
To integrity of their designs, Novo Nordisk’s Device Simulation department rely on computer simulation with Abaqus finite-element analysis (FEA) software from Simulia, an application of Dassault Systèmes of France (U.S. headquarters in Providence, R.I.). “Over a decade ago, I and my colleagues explored a number of commercial software codes,” says Torben Strøm Hansen, principal scientist in the Device R&D division of Novo Nordisk. “We chose Abaqus because it was a well-integrated solution that could model the nonlinear behavior of the fine details our designs correctly, including the high number of interfaces in contact.”
CAD model of insulin pen components. Gray and red parts snap fit onto the green part.
Besides modeling viscoelastic response to repeated snap fits over time, the designers had to predict the behavior of the materials in different environments, including elevated temperatures, even though the pens are assembled from different materials. And, some materials may contain carbon or glass fibers that show anisotropic behavior, which can be hard to predict. Even just sitting on a pharmacy shelf or in a consumer’s medicine cabinet, the materials are prone to creep and relaxation over time at rates that can vary with temperature.
Injection molded ratchet component from a medical device used by Novo Nordisk for a snap-fit benchmark study.
Hansen’s team at Novo Nordisk is now using the “parallel rheological framework” methodology available in Abaqus to model polymers’ nonlinear viscoelasticity with greater accuracy than before. The framework makes use of an arbitrary number of viscoelastic networks and an elastic equilibrium network to create a nonlinear model to predict and track changes in the internal structural networks of a polymer as it responds to repeated cyclic snap-fit loads. “Having material models incorporating time-dependent viscous behavior is very important for our work,” says Hansen. “We’re now able to simulate both creep and relaxation with Abaqus.” Since every type of polymer shows a different response to temperature, load, etc., the team continues to explore ways to identify the characteristics of different polymer networks.
Not only are such advanced models useful to designers in fine-tuning the latest insulin pen configuration, the data can help in manufacturing processes at the factory. “We have a process-simulating capability, through Autodesk Moldflow, for which Abaqus has an interface. This allows us to input the stress fields that result from the injection molding process right into our models. As a result, we have greater insight into our manufacturing process and are more able to design parts that have very low levels of residual stress in critical regions.”
Related Content
Optimizing Pack & Hold Times for Hot-Runner & Valve-Gated Molds
Using scientific procedures will help you put an end to all that time-consuming trial and error. Part 1 of 2.
Read MoreBack to Basics on Mold Venting (Part 1)
Here’s what you need to know to improve the quality of your parts and to protect your molds.
Read MoreInjection Molding: Focus on these Seven Areas to Set a Preventive Maintenance Schedule
Performing fundamental maintenance inspections frequently assures press longevity and process stability. Here’s a checklist to help you stay on top of seven key systems.
Read MoreProcess Monitoring or Production Monitoring—Why Not Both?
Molders looking to both monitor an injection molding process effectively and manage production can definitely do both with tools available today, but the question is how best to tackle these twin challenges.
Read MoreRead Next
People 4.0 – How to Get Buy-In from Your Staff for Industry 4.0 Systems
Implementing a production monitoring system as the foundation of a ‘smart factory’ is about integrating people with new technology as much as it is about integrating machines and computers. Here are tips from a company that has gone through the process.
Read MoreFor PLASTICS' CEO Seaholm, NPE to Shine Light on Sustainability Successes
With advocacy, communication and sustainability as three main pillars, Seaholm leads a trade association to NPE that ‘is more active today than we have ever been.’
Read MoreLead the Conversation, Change the Conversation
Coverage of single-use plastics can be both misleading and demoralizing. Here are 10 tips for changing the perception of the plastics industry at your company and in your community.
Read More