WSB Gravimetric Blenders
Published

New Way to Characterize Moldability Of Resins & Part/Tool Designs

Experienced injection molders have long known that a resin’s melt flow index (MFI), measured under very low-shear conditions, provides very little information about how it will process under many orders of magnitude higher shear in an actual mold.

Share

Experienced injection molders have long known that a resin’s melt flow index (MFI), measured under very low-shear conditions, provides very little information about how it will process under many orders of magnitude higher shear in an actual mold. They know, for example, that two materials of the same MFI can process quite differently, and a material of a lower MFI can sometimes process much easier than one with a higher MFI.

A better alternative is to use a capillary rheometer to produce curves of viscosity vs. shear rate, which clearly show changing viscosity caused by shear thinning. However, such curves provide mainly relative moldability comparisons; the units of measurement (Pascal-seconds for viscosity and reciprocal seconds for shear rate) are of no practical value in judging a resin’s process window.

If you have time, please tell us a little more about yourself.

Country

Industries Served

Operations Performed

Welcome to Plastics Technology!

Unlimited access to our free premium content requires a little more information from you.

Your email address will be used to communicate with you about Plastics Technology subscription offers, related products and services. Refer to our Privacy Policy for more information. Wondering why you’re seeing this? Read more here.

A novel solution to this problem was presented at NPE2012 in Orlando, Fla., last month by Beaumont Technologies Inc., Erie, Pa. As explained by CEO Dr. John Beaumont, his new Therma-Flo “moldometer” not only characterizes the injection moldability of polymer melts in a practically useful form, but it goes beyond all existing rheometers by measuring flow under the thermal conditions the melt “sees” when flowing through a cooled mold. Beaumont’s moldometer uses an actual injection molding machine, which fills a “mold-like apparatus” that contains 15 different geometries—some that resemble a modified trapezoidal runner, ranging in diameter from 0.040 to 0.180 in.; and some that resemble a cavity geometry from 0.020 to 0.120 in. thick. The system is designed to index automatically through the various geometries, filling one at a time, and molding parts in each geometry over a range of 10 injection speeds. With five repetitions for each speed, that amounts to 750 molding trials for each material. The flow channels have direct melt sensors to measure pressure and velocity with a high-speed data-collection system.

The accompanying graph shows a characteristic “moldometer flow sheet,” which is unlike anything produced by a typical rheometer. It shows the melt pressure in psi/in. required to flow a material through cavities of different thickness. The curves shown here for ABS display a typical drop in pressure required to go from very low speed to higher speed, as a result of shear thinning. More surprising is the fact that,
after the initial drop, the curves tend to level off, requiring little or no increase or decrease in pressure per inch of flow at higher and higher speeds. This would not be predicted from capillary rheometer curves, which show steadily declining viscosity at higher shear rates (related to flow speed). Beaumont believes that further research will establish a material’s “critical velocity” at which the moldometer’s psi/in. data can
be extrapolated to predict filling pressures in molds of any size. The “critical velocity” is the condition where the melt will not freeze off during filling because heat loss to the mold is exactly balanced by shear heating.

Beaumont sees many applications for his new material characterization method: comparing flowability of different materials or formulations; predicting ability to fill a mold within the pressure limitations of a given injection machine; and verifying the predictions of computer mold simulations.

Masters of Blending

Related Content

Is There a More Accurate Means to Calculate Tonnage?

Molders have long used the projected area of the parts and runner to guesstimate how much tonnage is required to mold a part without flash, but there’s a more precise methodology.  

Read More
Medical

What to Look for in High-Speed Automation for Pipette Production

Automation is a must-have for molders of pipettes. Make sure your supplier provides assurances of throughput and output, manpower utilization, floor space consumption and payback period.    

Read More
processing tips

Know Your Options in Injection Machine Nozzles

Improvements in nozzle design in recent years overcome some of the limitations of previous filter, mixing, and shut-off nozzles.

Read More
Molds & Tooling

Back to Basics on Mold Venting (Part 1)

Here’s what you need to know to improve the quality of your parts and to protect your molds.

Read More

Read Next

NPE

Making the Circular Economy a Reality

Driven by brand owner demands and new worldwide legislation, the entire supply chain is working toward the shift to circularity, with some evidence the circular economy has already begun.

Read More
Automation

People 4.0 – How to Get Buy-In from Your Staff for Industry 4.0 Systems

Implementing a production monitoring system as the foundation of a ‘smart factory’ is about integrating people with new technology as much as it is about integrating machines and computers. Here are tips from a company that has gone through the process.

Read More
NPE

For PLASTICS' CEO Seaholm, NPE to Shine Light on Sustainability Successes

With advocacy, communication and sustainability as three main pillars, Seaholm leads a trade association to NPE that ‘is more active today than we have ever been.’    

Read More
WSB Gravimetric Blenders