Can RA Surface Finish Standards Be Applied to an Injection Molded Part?
What options are available if traditional roughness average (RA) surface-finish can't be measured or met for a molded part?
Q: Some of our molders say they can’t accept a surface-finish spec using the traditional Roughness Average (RA) because they can’t measure it or meet it. We have found SPI mold-finish ratings in SPI standard AQ-103, but this seems to be an inspection spec. Is there a reason RA surface finish can’t be applied to, or measured on, a molded part? If not, is there some standard that can measured numerically instead of the AQ-103 standard, which is only pass/fail? I am concerned about sealing a rubber O-ring. The RA surface finish is what I know works, based on Parker O-ring guidelines. Is the SPI rating appropriate for sealing surfaces?
—Electronics OEM
A1:Typically RMA or RA is used to measure surface finish of cut metal. I see no reason why it could not be measured on a plastic part. The SPI finish is what is used for measurement of plastic parts. I would expect more variation due to the variability in the molding process, versus the controlled process of machining and polishing. I went looking online for a few minutes and this is what I found:
SPI SPE Method RMS (µ) inch
A-1 #1 Grade #3 Diamond Buff 0.5-1.0
A-2 Grade #6 Diamond Buff
A-3 #2 Grade #15 Diamond Buff 1.0-2.0
B-1 600 Grit Paper
B-2 400 Grit Paper
B-3 #3 320 Grit Paper 7.0-7.5
C-1 600 Stone
C-2 400 Stone
C-3 320 Stone
— #4 280 Stone 12.0-15.0
D-1 Dry Blast Glass Bead #11
D-2 #5 Dry Blast #240 Oxide 26.0-32.0
D-3 #6 Dry Blast #24 Oxide 160.0-190.0
Granted, you would need to convert RMS to RA. Can I vouch for total accuracy of the above data? No, I cannot. The SPI specs correlate to RMS readings in the chart. In my opinion, choose a RMS value you want, find the corresponding SPI finish then spec the mold to that finish. The molded part should match the finish of the mold. Exceptions would be knit lines, improper venting, or if the part is not packed out correctly.
Tim Atwood, technology manager
MSI Mold Builders Cedar Rapids, IA
(319) 848-7001
A2: Measuring textured plastic means taking a sample across a defined flat section of the surface and averaging the peaks and valleys. Unfortunately, few plastic pieces with tight tolerances have a flat expanse of an inch to evaluate. If you measure via contact, you are lightly scraping a probe/needle along the surface and risk digging into soft materials. If you measure optically, variations in surface texture affect the accuracy of the readings. There are some metrology technologies claimed to handle these tasks, but the investment is heavy. Check out: zemetrics.com; kla-tencor.com
John Berg, director of marketing,
MGS Mfg. Group, Germantown, WI
(262) 255-5790 • mgstech.com
Related Content
-
How to Optimize Color Evaluation of Recycled Plastics
The right color measurement instrument and good working methods will minimize variability in color evaluation of PCR.
-
Measuring Technology Specialist Pixargus Acquired by CiTex Group
A global player in optical inline quality control, Pixargus is intensifying presence in U.S. & Asia under CiTex umbrella.
-
Using a Melt Flow Indexer to Test Your Pressure Transducer
The MFI tester enables collection of meaningful pressure data in transducers in a relatively short time, providing realistic measures of the response time of a pressure transducer. This information is critical in the interpretation of pressure data measured in an extrusion process.